This story last week on NPR http://www.npr.org/2011/01/13/132864584/high-demand-nutritional-dilemma-vex-food-banks#commentBlock talked about the issue of food banks distributing all that is donated, including candy and other food with minimal nutritional value. I think the story missed a main point: It is not up to food banks to be the nutrition gatekeepers for our clients. We are not here to "do favors." Everyone deserves the dignity of a meal of their choosing, without a charitable gatekeeper.
We all need to learn to eat better and to understand the importance of good nutrition. It is also a societal responsibility to provide information and education about good nutrition, cooking well, and eating well for everyone, not just one group or another. This country used to provide that guidance, but stopped in the 1970's when the government began backing away from more aggressive nutrition and good eating advocacy that began during WWII. The 70's also were the advent of increased food processing and aggressive marketing of “junk” food.
I don't believe it is appropriate to single out 1 in 7 of our neighbors for disparate treatment just because they need to ask for help. Walk in those shoes and think how you would feel, if you found yourself being denied a certain food (or candy) because a charity decided it wasn't good for you.
I am saddened when people carry a hard heart and punitive attitude toward those who have been hit by financial hardship. Somehow, some people seem to believe that if one is hurting, then one must be actively denied even the smallest pleasures - pleasures they would not deny to themselves. Certainly, good nutrition needs to be a priority, and education is helpful in that regard, but when someone is in dire straits, the value of a little psychological boost cannot be underestimated. Physical nutrition is not the only value provided by food.
ReplyDeleteAmen!
ReplyDelete